Skip to main content
Learn · Co-location

Co-location vs Trading Proxy — What Is the Difference?

Co-location and trading proxies both minimise latency to the broker's matching engine. They take different approaches — and the right choice depends entirely on your trading frequency and budget.

TL;DR

Co-location means renting a physical server inside the same Equinix facility as the broker's matching engine. Sub-1ms latency, $500–$3000/month, requires server management. A trading proxy is a relay node positioned near the same facility. 2–8ms latency to the matching engine, fraction of the cost, no management required.

See the plansBroker DC reference
Sub-1ms
Co-lo latency from server to broker matching engine — the minimum possible.
2–8ms
Proxy latency from proxy node to matching engine — 80–95% of co-lo benefit.
$2k+ gap
Co-location: $500–$3000/month + ops. TradersProxy: fraction of that, zero management.

What co-location actually means

Co-location means renting server rack space inside the same physical building as the broker's matching engine — typically Equinix NY4 or LD4. Your server sits in the same DC, often on the same network segment. Latency to broker: 0.1–1ms. Used by: HFT firms, prop traders, and sophisticated algo traders. Cost: $500–$3000/month for server + colocation fees.

Who uses co-location (and who it is overkill for)

Co-location is used by: HFT firms (essentially required), professional quant traders, institutional market makers. Overkill for retail traders who: are not competing in sub-millisecond space, lack server management expertise, cannot justify the cost for 2–7ms improvement over a proxy.

What a trading proxy does instead

TradersProxy nodes are positioned in or adjacent to the same Equinix facilities. The proxy is on the same network infrastructure, often directly peered with broker servers. Via TradersProxy: platform ? proxy node (2ms from broker DC) ? broker matching engine (2–3ms hop). Total node-to-broker: 4–8ms. That is 80–90% of co-lo benefit without the cost or complexity.

Latency comparison table

Option Latency (node?broker) Monthly cost Management overhead
Co-location 0.1–1ms $500–$3,000/mo Full server ops required
TradersProxy 2–8ms $9–$25/mo None
VPS near DC 5–30ms $20–$80/mo Platform install only
Home connection 10–300ms ISP cost only None

Which is right for you?

Co-location: sub-5ms HFT strategies, can justify cost. TradersProxy: retail scalpers, news traders, active day traders who want the benefit without co-lo overhead. VPS: 24/7 uptime without latency focus. VPS + TradersProxy: the common pattern — uptime from VPS, latency from proxy. For full setup instructions, see how to configure SOCKS5 in MT4.

Execution Quality

95% of co-location's benefit at a fraction of the cost.

TradersProxy nodes sit in the same Equinix facilities as your broker. Direct-path routing to the matching engine — no co-location contract or server management required.

Try it free for 7 days
FAQ

Close but not identical. Co-lo: 0.1–1ms server-to-broker. Proxy: 2–8ms. For retail traders, the practical fill quality difference between 0.5ms and 5ms is negligible vs. the $2000+/month cost difference.

No benefit. If your server is already at the broker's DC, adding a proxy adds an unnecessary hop.

A dedicated fibre cable between two servers in the same DC. Enables sub-0.5ms routing. A proxy node at the DC gets similar benefit from the facility's internal network.

No. Co-lo = dedicated server in your name at the DC. TradersProxy = shared proxy service with nodes near those facilities. Different setup, similar latency result.

Most retail brokers do not. Some ECN brokers (LMAX etc.) do. For retail-facing brokers, TradersProxy is the practical equivalent — same DC neighbourhood, no co-location contract.